As recently reaffirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, neutral application of a policy to prorate incentive compensation contributions during leaves of absence does not unlawfully interfere with an employee’s rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). In Clemens v. Moody’s Analytics, Inc., Plaintiff contended that he was
FMLA
2019 EPLI Trends Report Published
Workplace law changes constantly. Employers and EPL carriers need to keep up with expanding risks, changing legal obligations, reason-defying jury verdicts, the #MeToo movement, and a record number of threatened and asserted claims associated with these changes. Our 2019 EPLI Trends Report gives an overview of the related risks and exposures employers and, by extension, …
Employer’s Misleading Statements Allow FMLA Claim to Survive Motion to Dismiss
The U.S. District Court in Wisconsin recently held in Reif v. Assisted Living by Hillcrest LLC d/b/a Brillion West Haven, that misleading statements by an employer regarding the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) can give rise to an FMLA interference claim, even before an employee is eligible for leave.
In January 2018, the…
Improving Someone Else’s Health (by Organ Donation) Qualifies an Employee for FMLA Leave
The United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) has just issued an Opinion Letter concluding that organ-donation surgery can qualify as a “serious health condition” under the FMLA. Specifically, the Opinion Letter affirmatively answered whether an employee may use FMLA leave for post-operative treatment where the employee donates an organ, even when the donor is in…
Hospital Compliance Officer’s Opposition to Termination of Co-Worker States a Claim of FMLA Retaliation
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia recently denied a Hospital’s motion to dismiss a Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) retaliation claim by a senior officer because of the close time proximity between a protest of alleged discriminatory treatment of a co-worker and the protester’s own discharge. Lott v. Not-For-Profit Hospital…
An Employee’s Workplace Asthma Attack May Trigger FMLA Protections
Many times, timing is everything (or nearly so). For example, in Dighello v. Thurston Foods, Inc. (and unlike the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling in Bailey v. Oakwood Healthcare, Inc., about which we recently wrote), the trial court held that a plaintiff who was discharged shortly after suffering an asthma attack at work plausibly…
Employer’s FMLA Policy and Legitimate Business Reason Lead to Early Dismissal of Employee’s Claim
In Everson v. SCI Tennessee Funeral Services, LLC., the federal court granted summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff’s FMLA claims because the worker failed to follow Defendant’s FMLA notice requirements when requesting leave. As discussed below, Plaintiff’s ADA claim also was dismissed.
In this lawsuit, Plaintiff alleged, among other things, that Defendant retaliated against him for…
Employee’s ADA and FMLA Claims Survive Summary Judgment After Leaving Work Early To Go To Hospital
In Knight v. Barry Callebaut USA Service Company, Inc., the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied an employer’s motion for summary judgment on claims brought by a terminated employee under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). During the work day, the…
Failure to Provide Documentation, Misconduct, Defeats FMLA Retaliation Claim in the Process
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York recently granted an employer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing wrongful termination claims. Cruz v. Wyckoff Heights Med. Ctr., No. 13 Civ. 8355 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2016). In Cruz, plaintiff used intermittent leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) for ulcerative…
Dismissal of Claims of Unlawful Discharge for Using FMLA Leave Highlight Importance of Accurate Record Keeping And Consistent Explanations For Employee Terminations
Too often weak claims of employment discrimination gain strength when employers fail to properly document and support with documentation the legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for an employee’s termination. While the burden of proof never leaves the claimant, and there is no explicit legal obligation to document the basis for personnel decisions, jurors may develop a negative …